This mandatory option can be free if you use DPP4. I hope you are doing the number one main most best thing and that is post editing and the use of Raw format. At club distances that may be a deal breaker if head shots are not the only shot you want. Two stops begins to be helpful and three stops is worthwhile but this will lead to a drastic decrease in DOF. As to a faster prime lens, that too will offer little help with insufficient light. Improvements like that move in tiny steps. A newer body may have better high ISO performance but it won't be a huge big deal. We are happy to look at your photos if you'd like to post them. If the new firmware gives it all the cool software features of the R62 people will be supremely happy. The R5 is currently the best selling/performing pro-sumer camera Canon has made to date. If things hold true, the R52 is going to be released before the R1 in 2024. There is always going to be another camera. Rumors indicate a feature packed firmware update is in the works. So just getting a full frame body doesn't mean your low light challenges would be solved. Your camera and lens are a system and work together. If making such a change is possible, moving to a R5 or R62 would improve things, but not a night to day improvement. If low light shooting was your goal, a full frame body might have been a better option. John's software recommendation might help too, Topaz and DxO have excellent noise reduction technologies. Ricky's "faster lens" suggestion would be a much better option. Do not believe a flash will not make you popular with your subjects or guests.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |